
SNMP can be implemented “securely.” There are absolutely valid security concerns when it comes to SNMP.You’ll not find it in most modern network monitoring tools. While SNMP isn’t the only network monitoring protocol, its ubiquity makes it table stakes for all network monitoring software. Network monitoring tools still use SNMP.Even more modern tech like Cisco SD-WAN devices support SNMP. You’d be hard-pressed to find network vendors that don’t support SNMP. Major network vendors still widely support SNMP.But as of today, it’s still alive and well. It might even be fair to call it “dead” sometime in the 2030s. In a decade or more, it’s likely that SNMP won’t be as ubiquitous as it is today. Frankly, the general point has some merit. They tout the emergence of SNMP alternatives like telemetry streaming as an indicator that the age of SNMP is over. Why SNMP isn’t deadĮven the most ardent of those claiming that “SNMP is dead” still concede it’s in widespread use. And, in the long term, I not-so-boldly predict we’ll see SNMP give way to some of them. However, there are SNMP alternatives out there now, and they do offer some advantages. And since I have my not-so-bold prediction hat on, I say it won’t be dead four years from now either. Welp, it’s four years later, and SNMP still isn’t dead. This sentiment ramped up even further after two Google engineers published their SNMP is Dead presentation in 2018. Since Windows 2012 R2 deprecated SNMP-and perhaps even earlier-there have been rumblings that SNMP was going the way of the Dodo.
#Peakhour windows plus#
That, plus the protocol’s age (SNMP is over 30 years old), helps explain why many in our industry have wanted to see SNMP go away, and a viable SNMP alternative emerges, for a while now. It’s been the de facto standard for most network-connected devices since the late 80s, so we’ve all used it at some point.īut despite the name, SNMP isn’t always simple to use. Most network engineers have a love/hate relationship with the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP).
